The new official Puteri 11 RA website is :

http://www.puchongputeri11.org/

Please update your bookmarks.

Sunday, May 30, 2010

High-rise condo protest at Sin Chew newspaper

In today's Sin Chew newspaper has an article on the Puteri 11 residents protest against the high-rise condo.

SinChew: Against the slope apartment residents fear the impact on traffic land structure

(雪蘭莪‧蒲種)發展商欲在斜坡上興建兩座各30層高的公寓,卻引起住在山坡上的公主城11區居民的不滿,恐怕引起土地安全和交通阻塞的問題。
公主城11區居民協會主席詹尊楨週六(5月29日)早上在新聞發佈會上說,梳邦再也市議會於去年5月發出公函給當地居民,指有發展商計劃在住宅區旁邊的斜坡上興建3座各約20層高的公寓,要求居民若有不滿即提出反意見。
他說,事後他們馬上成立臨時委員會,收集563個的居民簽名,並致函給當地人民代議士和行政議員,以表達對上述工程的反對。

他說,去年6月,蒲種國會議員哥賓星曾到此區巡視瞭解情況,委員會也致函給雪州大臣要求州政府關注這個問題。
他透露,去年7月2日,居民代表與市議會和發展商正式舉行第一次會議,市議會也聆聽居民的意見,並要求發展商必須提交有關當地交通、土地質量和建筑方面的評估報告。
排水系統欠佳前年曾土崩
“這個住宅區大約在兩年前開始有人搬進來,按照原來的計劃,斜坡上只會興建兩座5層樓高的公寓,而且前年6月也曾發生輕微的土崩,加上排水系統欠佳,下大雨時,雨水會滲透進入斜坡泥土中,令我們擔心斜坡上的土地安全問題。”
詹尊楨表示,當地有約800戶人家,交通流量和人潮不少,但是出入住宅區只有一條狹窄的道路,如果再興建大型公寓,恐會導致住宅區交通阻塞的問題。
他說,此區居民協會於去年11月正式獲準成立,並於5月17日與市議會進行第二次會議,發展商建議把工程改為興建兩棟各30層高的公寓,不過仍然沒有定案,因為市議會必須等待發展商呈交有關的評估報告。
盼發展商考量各因素
按最初計劃僅建5層公寓
詹尊楨強調,居民並沒有反對發展商的工程,只是希望考量到各種因素,能夠按照最初的計劃,只興建5層高的公寓即可。
另外,梳邦再也市議員陳佐翰指出,發展商如果想申請土地作為發展用途,必須向市議會一站式處理中心提出申請,然後市議會將發出通告,先質詢當地居民的意見,再作定奪。
他說,第一次會議時,市議會的確要求發展商提交上述評估報告,然後再詢問大馬公共工程研究院對於土地質量的意見。
他表示,發展商有權策劃任何工程,發展土地也是好事,只是市議會必須確保其可行性和考量安全問題。

1 comment:

  1. 1) SAFETY would be guaranteed by professional consulting engineer with personal liability - so it's not an issue here.

    2) TRAFFIC - widening of Jalan Puteri 11/1 is proposed by developer, so it'll not be an issue (reference: http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2010/6/3/central/6368004&sec=central)

    3) VIEW - YES! “When we bought our houses, we were shown this township model (showing) this piece of land will only be turned into some five-storey buildings,”

    “All Primrose, Olivia and Nadia purchasers were even convinced with the brochures that they would be able to enjoy a panorama view of the whole town,”

    “If they build such high-rise condominiums, how are we going to have our view?” - so there is only this point seems valid enough...

    4) SOLUTION! - why not appeal to MPSJ to change development to COMMERCIAL instead of RESIDENTIAL, more profit for developer and also rising value of resident property..

    ReplyDelete

Visitors to this blog are reminded NOT to post any comment which is indecent, obscene, false, menacing or offensive in character with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any person. Do Not post any comment which is religious sensitive, political ideology, racist, seditious and discriminatory. The blog moderator may delete any comment which goes against these rules.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.