Today 9th April, 2012, 10am En. Arifuddin (MPSJ Kejuruteraan), En. Hazman (MPSJ Perancang), Mr. Esmond Khor (Snr Project Manager IOI), Mr. Chong (IOI Engineer), Mr. Tan (IOI Traffic Consultant), Puteri Bayu’s residents, Puteri 11 Residents, Mr. Leo (Our Treasurer) and I were on the site discussing the new plan on where Puteri Hills entrance/exit be located and the new structure on widening Jalan Puteri 11/1.
Mr. Danile represented YB Gobind Singh because our YB has Parliament Sitting this morning and could not come for the discussion.
The entrance/exit will be move slightly down the road but still remained facing Puteri Bayu.
Existing width of the road of 28 ft. will be widened to 40 ft. until the last parking space and before our signage.
If so, I proposed them to widen till our Guardhouse instead if they insist to widen this road and to rebuild us both the guardhouse and P11 signage.
4 lanes will be made and these lanes will begin from the spot of Puteri Bayu’s entrance leading down to the junction.
40 car parks to accommodate Puteri Bayu’s residents will be extended to the area of the drain but no confirmation if this can be done solely depend on MPSJ approval.
Question is where will the new drainage system be located then? IOI and MPSJ will have to study this and to be discussed in the next meeting.
Queries as follows were made to MPSJ based on the gazette plan;
- Why Puteri 12 Main Road was gazette for 66 ft. in 2003 when P12 was the only 1 Hilltop project and was built at least 5 years before us?
- Why Jln 11/1 is gazette 50ft when this road has to accommodate not only P11 , Puteri Bayu but also P12 and Puteri Hills. Wouldn’t we need a bigger and wider road?
Furthermore both roads are categorized "MAIN ROAD" as it lead to the principal road of 100 ft. - Can Jalan Puteri 11/1 be upgraded and be made a better and safer road?
- How developers can use JKR basic factor for the Traffic Impact Study when all 3 Tamans are not a new township?
Therefore our query is why can’t a 3rd entrance/exit be allowed, which situated quite a distance apart from Jalan Puteri 11/1? No relevant answer was given.
Finally we asked IOI for a "Back up" plan as an assurance and for us to tackle future problems if any arises, instead of seeking help and solution from MPSJ in the future.
En. Hazman said it was gazette based on "Technical" reason and was studied by all experts and professionals that Jalan Puteri 11/1 has to be cut as it is and no upgrading can be allowed.
En. Ariffuddin suggested us to appeal to a higher authority "Lembaga Rayuan Negeri" if we are still not contented.
No doubt for all the assistance Mr. Ariffuddin has rendered to Puteri 11 on many occasion, we have to thank him for his kindness.
For all the documents we have asked for will be referred to his Superior for authority before any of it can be given to us.
We have yet to agree to the entrance/exit of Puteri Hills and also the proposed 4 lanes road of 40ft until;
- we see and have a "Backup" plan from the developer
- the extra lane for making the 40 car parks be sorted out for Puteri Bayu’s residents
- the justification on the cracks of 6 houses at Jln Puteri 12/3 (facing Jalan 11/13)
- the final decision of widening the road till our Guardhouse and to rebuilt the Guardhouse and P11 Signage.
Alice Choo
Chairman
No comments:
Post a Comment
Visitors to this blog are reminded NOT to post any comment which is indecent, obscene, false, menacing or offensive in character with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any person. Do Not post any comment which is religious sensitive, political ideology, racist, seditious and discriminatory. The blog moderator may delete any comment which goes against these rules.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.