Access Linked Road between Puteri 11 and Puteri 12

Our Ref: AR 2012-1/6/2012

Mr. Alan Tam
Chairman
RA Puteri 12
Bandar Puteri Puchong

17th June, 2012

BY EMAIL

Dear Alan,

Re: Access Linked Road between Puteri 11 and Puteri 12

Further to my email dated 4th June, 2012 and referred to our tele-conversation on Friday 8th June, pertaining to the captioned issue, which has been causing unnecessary dispute during the time of your predecessor.

We can understand that you desperately want to close the road but I am afraid that you are not allowed to do so.

We are not in the jurisdiction to agree with you for closing it permanently is because of the following reasons;

1. It is gazette as a public road
2. Mostly every Taman should have 2 exits, in case of any unforeseen emergency or accidents (eg. Fire, land sliding etc.). The back road is meant to be emergency exit / Secondary road for both Taman.
3. Many of our residents send their children to the Tadika in Puteri 12
4. Also many of your residents do exit/enter from Puteri 11 to send/deliver their children from Han Ming School at Bt. 14 Puchong.

 Furthermore you cannot install an automatic or Semi Auto Boom gate as this will be deemed as an OBSTRUCTION, which is a very uncertain move and unlawful because this obstruction on public spaces or road is bylaw illegal (in contravention of Section 46(1) (a) of Street Drainage and Building Act 1974, Section 80 of the Road Transport Act 1987 and Section(s) 62 and 136 of the National Landed Code 1965.

We felt so unpleasant and inappropriate for you to create boundaries and uncertainties between P12 and P11 residents.

According to me, the issue is not the back road but is Puteri 12 and Puteri 11 Security Committee should merge security information, systems, procedures and method into one to tighten and enhancing the safety for our residents. I hope my opinion will help in some way.

We have been waiting for you to meet us since last year from the time of your predecessor until your take over but were to no avail.

Nonetheless, during our tele-conversation, I advised you that I have attained the G & G acknowledgment from MPSJ on the 16th April, 2012, which I believe can help both Taman in enforcing a stricter procedure and would prefer to meet you and your team to further update you the details.

Despite of all our goodwill, it seems to us that you bear no interest to render neither any co-operation nor wanting to know more in details of the implementation except insisting to have your desire fulfilled by installing an automatic boom gate to create the boundaries. (This is what Mr. Allan Ng proposed before stepping down, probably this might have been withdrawn, we don’t know).

So before you made any final decision, I hope both RAs can sit down to discuss and to achieve a more cordial and compromising deal that favor both Taman.

It will be highly appreciated if this request can be look into with utmost urgency, please and reply me at your earliest possible on goodwill basis.

Thanking you

Yours faithfully,

Alice Choo
Chairman

c.c. CR. Chang Kim Loong Amn