Letter Of Appeal - Puteri 11 Guardhouse

Our Ref: G/HSE/APPEAL 1/06/2012

Yang Di Pertua
MPSJ
Persiaran Perpaduan, USJ 5
47610, Subang Jaya Darul Ehsan

6th June, 2012

Attn: Jabatan Perancangan Bandar
En. Hazman & Puan Rohana

Dear Sirs,

Re: Puteri 11 Main Guardhouse at Jalan Puteri 11/1

With reference to our TOL PTDP 4/PG 30/2011, we were told by En. Khairul of Pejabat Tanah Daerah Petaling that they have sent you their letter on 26th April, 2012, requesting for your “Surat Ulasan” in support to our application.

Somehow the grant has been delay is because they have not received the required review from you hence application is remained pending for finalization.

We also understood from your office that you have a position of “Tidak Sokong” and you are you not in favor of our application as you think that our guardhouse is wrongly located.

We understand that this guardhouse was built by our developer Messrs. IOI, 5 or 6 years ago and it was released to our RA in December, 2010 as per IOI letters ref. FD/G/33 (10) dated 29 December, 2010 (Syabas) and FD/G/34 (10) of 17 January, 2011 (TNB) respectively. (See as attached)

We also understand that the guardhouse was relocated to the current vicinity, after several rejections by the authorities (building the guardhouse in the middle of the road, similar to the Puteri 8, Puteri 9, Puteri 10 or Puteri 12 guardhouses) because those guardhouses in the middle of the road do not comply with the Standard Planning design gazette.

Puteri 11 is proud to declare that we are possibly the only Taman in the vicinity that has taken the proper initiative to seek respective Local Authorities for official consent to ensure our compliance with the regulated requirements and guidelines.

Owing to this Puteri 11 RA has obtained a 97% consensus from the residence, allowing the implementation of the Security Access System and by making it as a Gated & Guarded compound to enable a better security for the Taman and we are enclosing you all the Terms and Conditions signed by our residents for your references. Moreover we have no objection from P12 Residents Association thus far as we do comply with the G & G guidelines as stipulated.

Nonetheless, we have embarked on the path to ensure that the actions of providing a safe place to stay for our residents by adhering to all proper requirements and we believed all procedures have been addressed. 

One of the actions is to seek for a TOL for the guard house.

Having done all supposed we would like;

1. to understand the concerns of “ Tidak Sokong” by MPSJ and why?
2. what other procedures and actions need to be carried out in order to meet the criteria for us to obtain the support from MPSJ for the approval of the TOL by Pejabat Tanah Daerah Petaling?

However yesterday our CR. Chang Kim Loong and Puan Rohana from Jabatan Perancangan MPSJ paid a site visit to our guardhouse, upon viewing Cr. Chang comprehended that our guardhouse is appropriately located at the buffer area and the Security Access system installed did not affect the traffic flow in out the Taman, there is no obstruction to the road.

Consequently Cr. Chang agreed with us that the authorization for the guardhouse should be granted by all means.

In conclusion, we truly seek your positive review to enable Puteri 11 the TOL, in alignment to support the security enhancement in our Taman, which we managed to assure with the support of the Police Forces and the Community Police of Selangor.

We look forward for a favorable reply from you.

Thanking you for your usual kind assistance, we remain,

Yours faithfully,

Alice Choo
Chairman

c.c. CR Chang Kim Loong Amn
YB Gobind Singh
YB Teresa Kok
Pejabat Tanah Daerah Petaling – by registered Mail
Ms. Jessica Chan – Project Manager, Customer Services IOI