Encik Hazman Bin Mohd Mahayudin
Jabatan Perancangan Bandar
Persiaran Perpaduan, USJ 5
47610, Subang Jaya Darul Ehsan
Dear En. Hazman,
Re: PUTERI HILLS PROJECT
We hereby would like to enquire about this project of IOI, which they claimed to have submitted you the new plan somewhere last November.
In view of this, we would like to know at what stage this project has been approved after the developer has submitted you their D.O, please?
Also, I wish to highlight to you that the developer did not provide me with any report of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), Slope Stability Analysis (SSA), Environmental Impact Analysis (EIA) nor the new drawing of the township as agreed in our first meeting on 17 February, 2012.
Furthermore, Mr. Esmond has also agreed to have the soil tested but thus far, nothing has been carried out as said during the 2nd meeting on the 28th March, 2012.
Nevertheless, we also wish to have the JKR rules and regulations gazette for the Road, please, to know the feasibility to have Jalan Puteri 11/1 widened to 40 ft. and making it into 4 lanes of 10 ft. each instead of 66 ft. gazette for a MAIN ROAD.
We need your confirmation if is it correct that the TIA achieved by IOI Traffic Consultant Mr. Tan was supposedly based on JKR Basic Factor of 2 cars per household or on the actual amount of per household of Puteri Bayu (250 units) and Puteri 11 (471 units) as both respective property is no longer a new township?
In spite of the JKR Basic calculation factor, shouldn’t the traffic impact be analyzed, time and calculated hourly on both peak and non-peak period?
Furthermore, our developer insisted that they cannot cut any further slope from Lebuhraya Puteri 11/3 because of Ikram’s report.
May we asked is Ikram a governed body with full authority in ruling the cutting of slope? Is Ikram’s finding cannot be overturned?
Henceforth, there is no REASON why we cannot have a copy of all the reports summarized if everything is under the correct justification, or otherwise Mr. Esmond wouldn’t has agreed to it initially, wasn’t it? Therefore, we demand to have copy of it from you please, as directed by our developer.
In view of this, I wish to ask you for a copy of the following documents which our developer refused to do so although it was agreed upon during our first meeting on 17th February, 2012;
- Puteri 11 and Puteri Bayu Statutory Plans
- The summarized TIA, SSA and EIA
- The summarized reports from IKRAM on why the slope cannot be cut and new entrance/exit of Puteri Hills Township are not feasible.
- Copy of the Minutes for both 17th February (since it was not shown to us on the 2nd meeting) and 28 March, 2012 (if possible)
Despite of not getting what were presented by our developer during the launching period that have lured us buying such expensive property, we therefore is asking for our every right to pursue for further details which can help us to regain what we supposed to have.
Least by not last, we are looking forward for your office to arrange the site visit on Jalan Puteri 11/1 between MPSJ, our developer, us and all parties concerned within this week as said in the last meeting.
We thank you for your expedition in this matter and your usual kind attention is highly appreciated.
c.c. YB Gobind Singh
Mr. Chang Kim Loong - MPSJ Councilor
En. Arifuddin - T. Pengarah Kejuruteraan MPSJ
Mr. Esmond Khor - Snr. Project Manager, IOI
Mr. Soo - Chairman, Puteri Bayu