The new official Puteri 11 RA website is :

http://www.puchongputeri11.org/

Please update your bookmarks.

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

High-rise condo protest at MalaysiaKini website

MalaysiaKini has an article on the Puteri 11 residents protest against the high-rise condo.

MalaysiaKini: Puteri Puchong 11 residents say no to slope development

Some 530 residents at Bandar Puteri Puchong 11 voiced their protest against the proposed high-density development in the midst of two slopes, worried the land will not be able to support heavy buildings.

Puteri Puchong 11 residents’ association chairman Chiam Tun Cheng said the upper slope has exceeded 35 degrees in gradient and was hit with several landslides before.

"The slope collapsed last year and was then reinforced with a retention wall. We are worroed about the safety if they build such high-rise buildings over there,"

The proposed development by developer at the slender strip of land nearby Bayu Puteri Puchong and Puteri 11 includes two 18-storey buildings, one 19-storeycondominium, two 4-storey building and one 2-storey clubhouse.
The proposed high-rise buildings are located in between two slopes.

Besides prompting safety concerns, the residents also bemoan the traffic woes they might suffer.

"Currently we are sharing the same two-lane road with Bayu Puteri (condominium) residents, which is already congested because many Bayu Puteri residents park their cars by the side of the road,"

"Now we see the new project will also use the same road as the entrance, my question is, how (is that road) going to accommodate such traffic?"

He said the proposed project will see another 2110 residents coming in if fully occupied and will make the crooked road the only access route for all 5730 residents.
Going in and out is already an uneasy job for the residents now.

Two agents apparently supported the residents’ opinion. The department of drainage and irrigation in its letter dated March 31, 2009 said they do not support the project because they do not agree with the proposed on-site detention (OSD).

Infrastructure solution provider IKRAM meanwhile suggested that the project should be revised to a low-density one seeing that the site is steep in its surface and the buffer zone is not enough for high-rise buildings.

The residents, who mostly moved in during 2009, first saw the development notice board erected in June, 2009.

"We are surprised that what stated on the notice board was not the same as what we were (told).

"When we bought our houses, we were shown this township model (showing) this piece of land will only be turned into some five-storey buildings,"

"All Primrose, Olivia and Nadia purchasers were even convinced with the brochures that they would be able to enjoy a panorama view of the whole town,"

"If they build such high-rise condominiums, how are we going to have our view?"
The purchasers were promised a spacious panorama view in the brochures.

The residents submitted their protest to MPSJ and went for the council meeting with the developer twice. In the second meeting after both JPS and IKRAM suggestions were presented, the developer revised it into two even higher buildings instead of three.

"The residents are against any high-density development, we can only accept a low-rise one," Chiam said.

He meanwhile said the residents are still willing to discuss the issue with the developer to reach an amicable solution.

6 comments:

  1. 1) SAFETY would be guaranteed by professional consulting engineer with personal liability - so it's not an issue here.

    2) TRAFFIC - widening of Jalan Puteri 11/1 is proposed by developer, so it'll not be an issue (reference: http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2010/6/3/central/6368004&sec=central)

    3) VIEW - YES! “When we bought our houses, we were shown this township model (showing) this piece of land will only be turned into some five-storey buildings,”

    “All Primrose, Olivia and Nadia purchasers were even convinced with the brochures that they would be able to enjoy a panorama view of the whole town,”

    “If they build such high-rise condominiums, how are we going to have our view?” - so there is only this point seems valid enough...

    4) SOLUTION! - why not appeal to MPSJ to change development to COMMERCIAL instead of RESIDENTIAL, more profit for developer and also rising value of resident property..

    ReplyDelete
  2. on item-3, look at the fine print at the last page of the brochure to protect them. "All information... cannot form part of an offer or contract. ... All illustrations and pictures are artist's impressions only. ..."

    ReplyDelete
  3. With all being said, just be careful when you buy next property from developers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Further to reply to no. 3, yes, maybe artist's impressions only - it must be a very lousy artist because once the high-rise condominium is built, the view is not 5%, 10% or partially but more like FULLY TOTALLY blocked by CONCRETE! Where would be the view of low-lying city as shown in the picture? The view is paramount for some who purchased to enjoy the view. It's more like GROSS MISREPRESENTATION in terms of illustration at least.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Useful to receive all your constructive comments and views on the condominium issue. Your RA is also seeking legal and professional opinion on the matters. We will keep you all updated from time to time.

    RA Committee

    ReplyDelete
  6. There goes the developer's reputation that they have been building these years. I don't trust them anymore.

    ReplyDelete

Visitors to this blog are reminded NOT to post any comment which is indecent, obscene, false, menacing or offensive in character with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any person. Do Not post any comment which is religious sensitive, political ideology, racist, seditious and discriminatory. The blog moderator may delete any comment which goes against these rules.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.