The new official Puteri 11 RA website is :

http://www.puchongputeri11.org/

Please update your bookmarks.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

theStar: Residents say no to condo project

theStar: Residents say no to condo project

Bandar Puteri 11 residents want the developer to stick to constructing low-rise residential units instead of condominium blocks on a site near their homes.

They felt short-changed when the Subang Jaya Municipal Council (MPSJ) put up a notice about the proposed high-rise project in May last year.

They thought the piece of land was reserved for low-density houses as shown in the model when they purchased their houses.

About 30 of them gathered on Saturday morning to make their voices heard. They were concerned about safety issues.

“The narrow site is sandwiched between two steep slopes, and during a heavy downpour, we can see mini waterfalls gushing down the slopes.
Not suitable: The residents said it was not suitable to have condominium blocks on the narrow site sandwiched between two steep slopes.

“Soil erosion had occurred at a slope near our houses, which led to the construction of retaining walls. It would be too dangerous to build condominium blocks here,” residents association chairman TC Chiam said.

He added that the original plan was to have three 19-storey condominium blocks, but following a meeting last month, the developer had proposed to reduce the number of blocks to two but the number of units remained at 422.

Chiam said the residents are also worried about the possible traffic problems at the main road, Jalan Puteri 11/1.

“Cars are parked at both sides of the road in front of Bayu Puteri Apartments, which has caused many near-accidents.

“The situation would worsen if another high-rise residential block is constructed here,” he said.

Other concerns include the possible social impact and noise pollution.

The residents had summitted their objection letters to the Mentri Besar Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim, the MPSJ urban planning department, Puchong MP Gobind Singh Deo and state executive councillors Teresa Kok and Elizabeth Wong last year.

In July last year, the developer was asked to conduct geotechnical studies, traffic and environmental impact assessments.

MPSJ councillor Tan Jo Hann said the council has not approved the developer’s planning permission application.

“Our duty is to make sure that the developer takes all aspects of safety into consideration. Also, another access road must be identified should there be development here,” he said.

When contacted, a Flora Development spokesperson said the condominium project was stated in the approved layout plan and master layout brochure.

“It is in accordance to the approved layout plan with low density of 35 units per acre,” he said.

He added that the slope was safe and the developer would ensure it is maintained as such after building the proposed condominium.

“The geotechnical consultant is of the opinion that the proposed development shall not adversely affect the stability of slopes within the site by implementing the recommendations stated in the geotechnical assessment report.

“The report was designed to meet the most stringent requirement as in accordance to the Hong Kong Geotechnical Slope Manual.

“The recommendations are also in accordance with Public Works Institute’s (Ikram) requirement and all comments from Ikram are incorporated in the geotechnical assessment report,” he said.

As for the proposed project worsening the traffic situation at Jalan Puteri 11/1, the spokesperson said there are 274 vacant car parks during daytime and 126 at night in Bayu Puteri Apartments, but the residents seem to prefer to park along the road rather than within the compounds.

“Based on the traffic impact assessment conducted by our consultant, the current road is able to sustain the additional traffic from the proposed development.

“We will nevertheless consider widening the access road at Jalan Puteri 11/1,” the spokesperson said.

5 comments:

  1. 1) SAFETY would be guaranteed by professional consulting engineer with personal liability - so it's not an issue here.

    2) TRAFFIC - widening of Jalan Puteri 11/1 is proposed by developer, so it'll not be an issue (reference: http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2010/6/3/central/6368004&sec=central)

    3) VIEW - YES! “When we bought our houses, we were shown this township model (showing) this piece of land will only be turned into some five-storey buildings,”

    “All Primrose, Olivia and Nadia purchasers were even convinced with the brochures that they would be able to enjoy a panorama view of the whole town,”

    “If they build such high-rise condominiums, how are we going to have our view?” - so there is only this point seems VALID enough...

    4) SOLUTION! - why not appeal to MPSJ to change development to COMMERCIAL instead of RESIDENTIAL, more profit for developer and also rising value of existing residential property...WIN-WIN for all!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Flora claim that plenty car park space available in the apartment. Funny, thought I saw once that the JMB mention that the rented car park is full.
    Which resident is such a fool to park outside and get summon by MPSJ.(Resident Preferred !!!) What a Joke.

    Traffic Impact : The consultant Flora engage must be evaluation the situation during day time where there is no illegal parking along the road side and evaluate that all cars are just passing by.

    ReplyDelete
  3. get IOI to built a 3-4 storey car park 4d bayu puteri apt residents.
    IOI can make profit from selling parkins space to resident who has more than 1 car.
    The rest of the space rent it out monthly or whatever means to relatives n friends who come n drop by.
    atleast the road will be clear for everybody.
    everyboby WINS!

    ReplyDelete
  4. IOI already sold out the Bayu Puteri Apartments therefore IOI is no more in control of the property. The individual owners via their management committee can collectively decide to build more car parks inside their common area. Its doubtful such a proposal is feasible!

    RA Committee

    ReplyDelete
  5. We will suggest to IOI to incorporate some parking bays for Bayu Puteri Apartment owners/visitors in their development of the land just opposite.

    RA Committee

    ReplyDelete

Visitors to this blog are reminded NOT to post any comment which is indecent, obscene, false, menacing or offensive in character with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any person. Do Not post any comment which is religious sensitive, political ideology, racist, seditious and discriminatory. The blog moderator may delete any comment which goes against these rules.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.